Disclaimer - By publishing this information on this Web site, the Boston, Massachusetts law firm of Altman & Altman LLP is not claiming to represent any clients or cases mentioned here. The content provided is designed to inform readers and is not intended as legal advice.

Buckyballs and Buckycube Magnet Maker Sued By CPSC Over Child Injuries

In a rare move, the US Consumer Product and Safety Commission is pursuing an administrative lawsuit against Maxfield & Oberton Holdings LLC claiming that its magnet toys are defective products. The manufacturer of the Buckycubes and Buckyballs products is disputing the allegations.

The small, round magnets are normally sold in sets of more than 200 pieces and are considered adult toys. Unfortunately, one too many kids under the age of 14 has ended up suffering severe injuries from accidentally swallowing more than one of the individual magnets. The victim might be a toddler who has decided to put the shiny round objects in his/her mouth or an older kid pretending that the magnet is a tongue piercing.

The danger happens once the magnets reach the stomach and intestines where they are inevitably drawn to each other and can end up tearing holes in the different organs, or cause blood poisoning or even death, as they come together. The CPSC is aware of at least a dozen child magnet ingestion injuries since 2009 when more than 2 million Buckyball and Buckycubes sets were sold in this country.

In 2010, at the agency’s prodding, Maxfield and Oberton Holdings recalled more than 175,000 buckyball sets because their label said they could be used by people age 13 and above. Loose magnets cannot be sold to anyone younger than 14. However, the CPSC believes that these magnet sets are not only defective in design, but also, they come with warning, instruction, and packaging defects-all flaws that are covered under products liability laws for purposes of recovering damages.

Grounds for a Boston products liability lawsuit generally include breach of warranty, negligence, and misrepresentation. However, it doesn’t matter if product was designed, made, and marketed as intended. Massachusetts products liability law follows a strict liability policy that can allow plaintiffs injured from even these products to recover compensation.

Read the Administrative Complaint (PDF)

Gastrointestinal Injuries from Magnet Ingestion in Children — United States, 2003–2006, CDC

More Blog Posts:
Woman Files Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Against Boston Scientific For Her Pain and Permanent Injuries, Boston Injury Lawyers Blog, July 11, 2012

Fire Hazards Prompt CPSC To Recall Frigidaire Gas Range, Big Lots Ceramic Space Heaters, and Other Products, Boston Injury Lawyers Blog, June 21, 2012

Products Liability: Massachusetts Manufacturer is One of Several Companies to Issue May Recalls to Prevent Child Injuries, Boston Injury Lawyers Blog, May 28, 2012